You gotta love the hypocrisy of liberals. With them, inconsistency is the one thing you can rely on.
They spend how many hundreds of billions of dollars on stimulus, and then they worry about whether or not we can "afford" tax cuts for the rich. Priceless.
They are extending the Bush-era tax cuts for the middle class, however, which is a good thing. If that's the only option, as John Boehner said, we'll take what we can get.
I guess that's what you have to do when Obama's in the White House and Dems dominate Congress.
Read between the lines.
We'll take what we can get, and then we'll take the midterms.
Sunday, September 12, 2010
Of Mosques and Men
No one is denying the Muslims the constitutional right to build the mosque. We're just asking for sensitivity on the issue of the site of the building.
If this really weren't a political stunt, Muslims would have no problem moving the mosque, would they? It would be of no consequence where the mosque was, and out of empathy and sensitivity for fellow Americans, they would move the mosque. They would quietly agree with the American people. This would not be an issue. And yet.
Were this not a political stunt, it would have no place in politics at all.
And yet.
My English teacher this year is a hardcore liberal, as I believe I've mentioned before. And he was trying to get us to think outside the box. (Little Red Riding Hood is the story of a transvestite pedophile.) He asked how we'd like to know that 9/11 was a conspiracy by our own government.
Earlier he had told us not to hate Muslims and gays. Of course, hate means anything that would remotely offend anyone in any way, shape, or form. So "discriminating" and "profiling" would fall under that category, right next to "suspicion" and "wariness". So in that sense I hate Muslims. Anyway, he tells us not to "hate" Muslims, and yet we can be as quick as--quicker than--we want in "hating" our government and assuming they were behind the 9/11 attacks. This is the logic of the liberal. You can't win, or they'll call you a name and point to your argument as evidence for theirs. You can't catch them in their own lies, because they'll just deny it with such convincing zeal that everyone will think you're crazy "which they will staunchly affirm).
The only solution is duct tape.
If this mosque is built (the "if" is just meant for grammar, not as a description of reality), al Quaeda will see it and remember that Obama is President and they can do whatever they want. At least, I'm sure they have the constitutional right, from the living (dying) constitution, to do so.
But that doesn't mean they should.
If this really weren't a political stunt, Muslims would have no problem moving the mosque, would they? It would be of no consequence where the mosque was, and out of empathy and sensitivity for fellow Americans, they would move the mosque. They would quietly agree with the American people. This would not be an issue. And yet.
Were this not a political stunt, it would have no place in politics at all.
And yet.
My English teacher this year is a hardcore liberal, as I believe I've mentioned before. And he was trying to get us to think outside the box. (Little Red Riding Hood is the story of a transvestite pedophile.) He asked how we'd like to know that 9/11 was a conspiracy by our own government.
Earlier he had told us not to hate Muslims and gays. Of course, hate means anything that would remotely offend anyone in any way, shape, or form. So "discriminating" and "profiling" would fall under that category, right next to "suspicion" and "wariness". So in that sense I hate Muslims. Anyway, he tells us not to "hate" Muslims, and yet we can be as quick as--quicker than--we want in "hating" our government and assuming they were behind the 9/11 attacks. This is the logic of the liberal. You can't win, or they'll call you a name and point to your argument as evidence for theirs. You can't catch them in their own lies, because they'll just deny it with such convincing zeal that everyone will think you're crazy "which they will staunchly affirm).
The only solution is duct tape.
If this mosque is built (the "if" is just meant for grammar, not as a description of reality), al Quaeda will see it and remember that Obama is President and they can do whatever they want. At least, I'm sure they have the constitutional right, from the living (dying) constitution, to do so.
But that doesn't mean they should.
Saturday, September 11, 2010
Never Forget. Ever.
Yesterday night I was watching a documentary on Fox News about 9/11. I watched a cloud of dust engulf the space where the towers used to be. I saw people screaming, crying, running, dying. And I thought, there is no freaking way that the people who did this to MY COUNTRY are going to build their mosque anywhere near there. No way. I would march down there myself and... I don't know, do something, if my parents would let me. :/
Pastor Jones, who I've been hearing a bit about, the one who was/is going to burn Korans today? While I question the truth of his statement that the imam was going to move the mosque if Jones didn't burn the Koran, what happened on msnbc yesterday morning was simply unbelievable.
On Morning Joe, they called the guy in just to lecture him and implore him not to burn the Koran, and then they cut him off. He said nothing. They wouldn't let him. The last thing they said on the matter was, "And I think that's all we need to hear about that." Yeah, all we need to hear and then some. Since when is it the job of a news organization to lecture someone on morals and not give them a chance for rebuttal, as if this is the absolute truth and you are totally in the wrong? Since when does an interview consist of a lecture and then, oops, something appears to have interfered with our connection. Yeah, something interfered. It's called B.S.
How does this sound? Muslims have the constitutional right to build a mosque near Ground Zero, but that doesn't mean it's the right thing to do. However, if your Saturday plans are burning the Koran, SCREW YOU, YOU DISCRIMINATING BIGOT! TAKE YOUR HATE SOMEWHERE ELSE!
How about, Screw you, you insensitive political stunt man! Take your anti-American sentiment somewhere else!
Another thing. Notice Obama "vs." terrorists and Bush vs. terrorists. Obama: "Don't be mean. Don't discriminate. They have a constitutional right to kill Americans... oh, wait. That's a different issue. I think my cue cards are out of order. Anyway! we need to be nice so they'll be nice, too."
Bush: "HUNT THEM DOWN."
Whatever else he may be, whatever else he has or hasn't done, Bush got it right on a couple things. Abortion, for one. And keeping America safe. Which is his job. His job isn't to keep Muslims safe. That's not in the Presidential Oath of Office. Bush seemed to grasp that. Obama, not so much. Although, we should cut him some slack since he's not familiar with the customs of this country.
Speaking of the country, I have U.S. History this year, and I am LOVING it. We're starting with the end of the Civil War/Reconstruction. It's awesome. But the theme kind of seems to be "Oh, the poor South. They lost the war and now their land is ravaged, their women are widowed, and their children are orphaned. And here come the big bad Radical Republicans, who want them to--gasp!--take an oath of loyalty to the Union! The horror! The humiliation! They want civil rights guaranteed! They want the South under military watch! They won't let former Confederate officers run for office! What did the South do to deserve this?????
I assume this was an act of racism by Republicans against whites. Or, hey, blacks. It's all the same. Whatever.
Screw the South! If they didn't want it to happen, why'd they start the war?
While we're on the subject of school, my science book is written like some liberal's diary. It tells me to open my mind and heart. It says that overpopulation is a serious problem that worsens almost every problems faced by humans today. The last part of the first chapter tells me to advance into the cosmos because "we live in an exciting time!"
It's like the self-help book for today's troubled liberal. Which I don't need because I'm not troubled or liberal. (It's pretty hard to be one without the other.)
While we're talking about troubledness, transexuals are actually at odds with the liberal worldview. If we're supposed to accept people "for who they are," well, why don't they have to accept THEMSELVES for who they are? How come they get to change?
I suppose it's wrong to judge their "lifestyle choices." Fine. I just hope you don't judge my "lifestyle choice" to start tee-peeing liberals' houses.
Why must they screw our country? What do they have against it?
Shrug. What does it matter? Smart people (I hope I don't have to specify the party) are going to DOMINATE the elections in a couple months. And then Obama won't be able to pass bills like he does, and even if they do go through (which they won't unless we elect RINOs [like in Michigan's gubernatorial race]), it'll take longer because Republicans, even, most RINOs, have this thing about READING bills before they pass them.
Anyway, American or liberal, we all have a job to do. For liberals, it's to balance out the awesomeness of using your brain. But until we have enough brains for everyone (and not by redistributing them), we'll have to do our best to keep our country safe. Which means no more 9/11. Or tolerance thereof. (That's me, the mean Republican who doesn't like people blowing up my country.) 9/11 must be remembered, not repeated.
You see, I don't remember 9/11 very well. I was, like, five. But even though I don't really remember it, I will never, ever forget.
Pastor Jones, who I've been hearing a bit about, the one who was/is going to burn Korans today? While I question the truth of his statement that the imam was going to move the mosque if Jones didn't burn the Koran, what happened on msnbc yesterday morning was simply unbelievable.
On Morning Joe, they called the guy in just to lecture him and implore him not to burn the Koran, and then they cut him off. He said nothing. They wouldn't let him. The last thing they said on the matter was, "And I think that's all we need to hear about that." Yeah, all we need to hear and then some. Since when is it the job of a news organization to lecture someone on morals and not give them a chance for rebuttal, as if this is the absolute truth and you are totally in the wrong? Since when does an interview consist of a lecture and then, oops, something appears to have interfered with our connection. Yeah, something interfered. It's called B.S.
How does this sound? Muslims have the constitutional right to build a mosque near Ground Zero, but that doesn't mean it's the right thing to do. However, if your Saturday plans are burning the Koran, SCREW YOU, YOU DISCRIMINATING BIGOT! TAKE YOUR HATE SOMEWHERE ELSE!
How about, Screw you, you insensitive political stunt man! Take your anti-American sentiment somewhere else!
Another thing. Notice Obama "vs." terrorists and Bush vs. terrorists. Obama: "Don't be mean. Don't discriminate. They have a constitutional right to kill Americans... oh, wait. That's a different issue. I think my cue cards are out of order. Anyway! we need to be nice so they'll be nice, too."
Bush: "HUNT THEM DOWN."
Whatever else he may be, whatever else he has or hasn't done, Bush got it right on a couple things. Abortion, for one. And keeping America safe. Which is his job. His job isn't to keep Muslims safe. That's not in the Presidential Oath of Office. Bush seemed to grasp that. Obama, not so much. Although, we should cut him some slack since he's not familiar with the customs of this country.
Speaking of the country, I have U.S. History this year, and I am LOVING it. We're starting with the end of the Civil War/Reconstruction. It's awesome. But the theme kind of seems to be "Oh, the poor South. They lost the war and now their land is ravaged, their women are widowed, and their children are orphaned. And here come the big bad Radical Republicans, who want them to--gasp!--take an oath of loyalty to the Union! The horror! The humiliation! They want civil rights guaranteed! They want the South under military watch! They won't let former Confederate officers run for office! What did the South do to deserve this?????
I assume this was an act of racism by Republicans against whites. Or, hey, blacks. It's all the same. Whatever.
Screw the South! If they didn't want it to happen, why'd they start the war?
While we're on the subject of school, my science book is written like some liberal's diary. It tells me to open my mind and heart. It says that overpopulation is a serious problem that worsens almost every problems faced by humans today. The last part of the first chapter tells me to advance into the cosmos because "we live in an exciting time!"
It's like the self-help book for today's troubled liberal. Which I don't need because I'm not troubled or liberal. (It's pretty hard to be one without the other.)
While we're talking about troubledness, transexuals are actually at odds with the liberal worldview. If we're supposed to accept people "for who they are," well, why don't they have to accept THEMSELVES for who they are? How come they get to change?
I suppose it's wrong to judge their "lifestyle choices." Fine. I just hope you don't judge my "lifestyle choice" to start tee-peeing liberals' houses.
Why must they screw our country? What do they have against it?
Shrug. What does it matter? Smart people (I hope I don't have to specify the party) are going to DOMINATE the elections in a couple months. And then Obama won't be able to pass bills like he does, and even if they do go through (which they won't unless we elect RINOs [like in Michigan's gubernatorial race]), it'll take longer because Republicans, even, most RINOs, have this thing about READING bills before they pass them.
Anyway, American or liberal, we all have a job to do. For liberals, it's to balance out the awesomeness of using your brain. But until we have enough brains for everyone (and not by redistributing them), we'll have to do our best to keep our country safe. Which means no more 9/11. Or tolerance thereof. (That's me, the mean Republican who doesn't like people blowing up my country.) 9/11 must be remembered, not repeated.
You see, I don't remember 9/11 very well. I was, like, five. But even though I don't really remember it, I will never, ever forget.
Sunday, September 5, 2010
God--And I Do Mean God--Bless America
A high school student in Colorado was told that he had to take down two U.S. flags flying from the bed of his pickup truck because they might make other students uncomfortable.
I'd like to ask the security official to please remove the "F America" sticker from her forehead because that makes some people uncomfortable.
The security official reportedly told the student that the school promoted diversity. ("America doesn't have a national language or a national religion, so why have a national nationality?!?!?")
Yes. We all know that the word American, and the American flag, is offensive to some Americans.
... ... ...Wait, what?
The only "Americans" that the American flag offends are idiot liberals and terrorists. These people aren't really American anyway. Soon we won't be able to eat meat because it offends vegetarians, we won't be able to use guns because... never mind, that's already in the works. We won't be able to use paper or live in houses because that offends trees and their human spouses. We won't be able to go to church because... Oh. Again, that's already in the works. Ah, the things we do for the sake of political correctness. Aren't we just adorable?
Speaking of "Americans," Republicans are leading the Democrats in the polls by ten percent, the largest gap in almost seventy years. Bam.
However, Republicans need to pull themselves together. Literally. There are the Tea Partiers, the GOP, the Constitutional Conservatives... I happen to agree with a lot of these branches, but I think that all of the... denominations of Republicans need to unite. That's how we get the votes. A great guy with great values running with a label nobody's heard of is just going to dilute the votes.
Another thing: we need to stop running moderates. All they do is slowly compromise anything they've said they believe in (which is little in the first place). RINOs need to get out. You can't be a cafeteria conservative. Either choose or join the Dark Side. May the Force be with you.
Republicans need to change the face of their party into a strong face that people can trust. Because being better than Democrats is not going to help America or keep them in power. Saddam Hussein was "better than" the devil. That doesn't make him good. Republicans can't be better. We have to be the best.
And we can, if we vote smart, don't kill babies, and work hard to make the world a better place (through strength, not taking military funds to save the llama tree or something).
So fly your flags! Unite! Vote!
And most importantly, think.
And Democrats, as for you guys... just, um... keep doing what you do. It gets us elected so we can undo it.
We'll put those crosses back up in Utah. We'll remove the terrorists from the White House and from your backyards and courtrooms. We'll save babies (and really save them, as in save their lives, not put them on welfare). We'll pray, to God, for America (three birds with one stone). We'll establish a state language. Oh, oh, we'll get borders. Those would be nice. And freedom, with no extra charge! We'll give people's money back... Oh, the things we'll do, the places we'll go, the people we'll see. I love America. We need to elect officials who do, too.
God (not Allah) bless America.
I'd like to ask the security official to please remove the "F America" sticker from her forehead because that makes some people uncomfortable.
The security official reportedly told the student that the school promoted diversity. ("America doesn't have a national language or a national religion, so why have a national nationality?!?!?")
Yes. We all know that the word American, and the American flag, is offensive to some Americans.
... ... ...Wait, what?
The only "Americans" that the American flag offends are idiot liberals and terrorists. These people aren't really American anyway. Soon we won't be able to eat meat because it offends vegetarians, we won't be able to use guns because... never mind, that's already in the works. We won't be able to use paper or live in houses because that offends trees and their human spouses. We won't be able to go to church because... Oh. Again, that's already in the works. Ah, the things we do for the sake of political correctness. Aren't we just adorable?
Speaking of "Americans," Republicans are leading the Democrats in the polls by ten percent, the largest gap in almost seventy years. Bam.
However, Republicans need to pull themselves together. Literally. There are the Tea Partiers, the GOP, the Constitutional Conservatives... I happen to agree with a lot of these branches, but I think that all of the... denominations of Republicans need to unite. That's how we get the votes. A great guy with great values running with a label nobody's heard of is just going to dilute the votes.
Another thing: we need to stop running moderates. All they do is slowly compromise anything they've said they believe in (which is little in the first place). RINOs need to get out. You can't be a cafeteria conservative. Either choose or join the Dark Side. May the Force be with you.
Republicans need to change the face of their party into a strong face that people can trust. Because being better than Democrats is not going to help America or keep them in power. Saddam Hussein was "better than" the devil. That doesn't make him good. Republicans can't be better. We have to be the best.
And we can, if we vote smart, don't kill babies, and work hard to make the world a better place (through strength, not taking military funds to save the llama tree or something).
So fly your flags! Unite! Vote!
And most importantly, think.
And Democrats, as for you guys... just, um... keep doing what you do. It gets us elected so we can undo it.
We'll put those crosses back up in Utah. We'll remove the terrorists from the White House and from your backyards and courtrooms. We'll save babies (and really save them, as in save their lives, not put them on welfare). We'll pray, to God, for America (three birds with one stone). We'll establish a state language. Oh, oh, we'll get borders. Those would be nice. And freedom, with no extra charge! We'll give people's money back... Oh, the things we'll do, the places we'll go, the people we'll see. I love America. We need to elect officials who do, too.
God (not Allah) bless America.
Friday, September 3, 2010
Unprecedented
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/dcnow/2010/09/feds-sue-arizona-sheriff-in-civil-rights-probe.html (It won't come up as a link, so just copy and paste this if you want to read the whole article. Sorry.)
So let's say you're a sheriff in Arizona who's trying to do his job and keep illegals out.
Who's more likely to immigrate from MEXICO, Mexicans or someone else? I'm thinking Mexicans, and that is also what Sheriff Arpaio thought.
Logic is discrimination, just as dissent is discrimination. Heck, purple kitties are probably discrimination.
Anyway, Arpaio says he won't turn over records in this "civil rights" case because the feds haven't stated what they're looking for. (Although, since we're talking the Obama administration here, it's obvious what they're looking for: a reason to be over-PC.)
Not to mention the fact that, you know, they're completely out of line. If they find out some of the Mexicans Arpaio was "discriminating" against were Muslims, he can kiss his behind goodbye.
Best yet, they've called his actions "unprecedented." Has the federal government ever sued a state before? Have they ever sued a sheriff before? No.
This is what is known as "unprecedented."
So let's say you're a sheriff in Arizona who's trying to do his job and keep illegals out.
Who's more likely to immigrate from MEXICO, Mexicans or someone else? I'm thinking Mexicans, and that is also what Sheriff Arpaio thought.
Logic is discrimination, just as dissent is discrimination. Heck, purple kitties are probably discrimination.
Anyway, Arpaio says he won't turn over records in this "civil rights" case because the feds haven't stated what they're looking for. (Although, since we're talking the Obama administration here, it's obvious what they're looking for: a reason to be over-PC.)
Not to mention the fact that, you know, they're completely out of line. If they find out some of the Mexicans Arpaio was "discriminating" against were Muslims, he can kiss his behind goodbye.
Best yet, they've called his actions "unprecedented." Has the federal government ever sued a state before? Have they ever sued a sheriff before? No.
This is what is known as "unprecedented."
Resting in Pieces vs. Living In Peace
Almost sixty percent of Americans (which is really 100% of Americans) believe the Iraq War was the right thing to do.
I'd rather live in a strong peace than die in a weak one. There's not even a contest there. Peace comes through strength. The only peace the weak get is that which they rest in.
I have a question to ask the 35% of "Americans" who believe it was wrong: if war is not the answer, what is? Do we just hide in bomb shelters until we've lost everything and pieces of the American dream are scattered across the bomb-scarred plain, until even the cockroaches are gone?
Or do we get off our lazy, illogical, scared, weak, weenie butts and do something?
According to 58% of Americans, that is indeed what we do.
I'd rather live in a strong peace than die in a weak one. There's not even a contest there. Peace comes through strength. The only peace the weak get is that which they rest in.
I have a question to ask the 35% of "Americans" who believe it was wrong: if war is not the answer, what is? Do we just hide in bomb shelters until we've lost everything and pieces of the American dream are scattered across the bomb-scarred plain, until even the cockroaches are gone?
Or do we get off our lazy, illogical, scared, weak, weenie butts and do something?
According to 58% of Americans, that is indeed what we do.
A Field In Pennsylvania
"Guess what?"
"The jobless numbers are climbing, even though we're 'recovering' and the stimulus is 'working.'"
"Yeah, but I bet you didn't know that--"
"Republicans want Obama to 'change' like he was supposed to by doing something that actually HELPS the economy."
"Oh. Okay, so you do know. Well, you'll never guess what Obama said in reply."
"'We're heading in the right direction'?"
"Wow. I guess this is getting pretty predictable. But I bet you don't know what the Democrats want to do in order to KEEP heading in the right direction."
"Push through another hundreds-of-billions-of-dollars-worth of stimulus?"
"Okay, never mind."
In other news, the Ground Zero mosque and a terrorist organization are in the same funding pool. A key investor in the mosque also happened to be a key investor in Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, or HLF, which is a terror organization that supported the terrorist group Hamas.
Of course, the "investor," Hisham Elzanaty, thought he was donating to an orphanage when he donated to HLF. Well, he is helping create orphans...
And now he's, of course, funding the mosque (not to be confused with the terrorist organization he funded previously). What's wrong with the mosque? We've been over this. It's an issue of national security. A bunch of Muslims go in to "pray," meet, walk two blocks, and bomb whatever we put in place of the World Trade Center (in case they don't already own it anyway). Another issue is: Osama bin Ladin's out there, he looks and says, "Hey, look. That Obama idiot, bless his heart, is a Muslim-friendly, clueless dirtbag. Bombs away! Heck, I might even get a medal, or, hey, a Nobel Peace Prize for this attack." It's an issue of national dignity as well.
And finally, it's an issue of sensitivity. Americans, like the brave souls who saved the White House and crashed in a field in Pennsylvania, are the ones who deserve anything here, like respect. We can respect Muslims and Muslim Americans, too, but Americans should care for Americans first. Terrorists aren't even a close second. If Muslims really were peaceful and respected America, they'd move their "cultural center" a few blocks. But they won't, because this is them pushing the envelope a little bit farther (because, you know, they didn't push it enough on 9/11). If we let them have this, they'll take anything. If we let them have this mosque at Ground Zero, they'll soon take Ground Zero itself. And maybe the Pentagon.
And maybe a field in Pennsylvania.
"The jobless numbers are climbing, even though we're 'recovering' and the stimulus is 'working.'"
"Yeah, but I bet you didn't know that--"
"Republicans want Obama to 'change' like he was supposed to by doing something that actually HELPS the economy."
"Oh. Okay, so you do know. Well, you'll never guess what Obama said in reply."
"'We're heading in the right direction'?"
"Wow. I guess this is getting pretty predictable. But I bet you don't know what the Democrats want to do in order to KEEP heading in the right direction."
"Push through another hundreds-of-billions-of-dollars-worth of stimulus?"
"Okay, never mind."
In other news, the Ground Zero mosque and a terrorist organization are in the same funding pool. A key investor in the mosque also happened to be a key investor in Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, or HLF, which is a terror organization that supported the terrorist group Hamas.
Of course, the "investor," Hisham Elzanaty, thought he was donating to an orphanage when he donated to HLF. Well, he is helping create orphans...
And now he's, of course, funding the mosque (not to be confused with the terrorist organization he funded previously). What's wrong with the mosque? We've been over this. It's an issue of national security. A bunch of Muslims go in to "pray," meet, walk two blocks, and bomb whatever we put in place of the World Trade Center (in case they don't already own it anyway). Another issue is: Osama bin Ladin's out there, he looks and says, "Hey, look. That Obama idiot, bless his heart, is a Muslim-friendly, clueless dirtbag. Bombs away! Heck, I might even get a medal, or, hey, a Nobel Peace Prize for this attack." It's an issue of national dignity as well.
And finally, it's an issue of sensitivity. Americans, like the brave souls who saved the White House and crashed in a field in Pennsylvania, are the ones who deserve anything here, like respect. We can respect Muslims and Muslim Americans, too, but Americans should care for Americans first. Terrorists aren't even a close second. If Muslims really were peaceful and respected America, they'd move their "cultural center" a few blocks. But they won't, because this is them pushing the envelope a little bit farther (because, you know, they didn't push it enough on 9/11). If we let them have this, they'll take anything. If we let them have this mosque at Ground Zero, they'll soon take Ground Zero itself. And maybe the Pentagon.
And maybe a field in Pennsylvania.
Thursday, September 2, 2010
Electronics
A new Obama administration rule requires that medical records be digitalized. Those who don't make the switch by 2015 (when, God willing, someone else will be President), of course, must pay a penalty. You don't comply with socialism, you pay a penalty so the government can use more of your money for more socialism. It's a great gig they've got going.
Of course, many small rural hospitals or small community hospitals can't pay for either the transition to electronic records or the fine for not transitioning to electronic records. So they're pretty much screwed, I guess.
Not to mention the fact that people's personal information is at stake. First of all, hackers, et cetera can steal their Social Security numbers. Second of all, I'm sure that if the government wanted a peek at your personal information, all conveniently digitalized, they could get it. Conspiracy theory? Maybe. Maybe not.
I bet that soon, everything that used to have to be on paper will be digitalized. Take the Constitution, for example. All you'd have to do to change it would be to open a Word document and edit it.
And Obama could easily make a fake birth certificate if it was electronic. Just type out the words, "I was born," and make everyone else make the switch to digital birth certificate. No one would be the wiser!
How about all money has to be electronic, too? The government would be able to get their hands on it a lot more easily if it was electronic, because they could just take it right out of your bank account. No more tax forms, the government just takes the money and you don't have to worry about a thing.
Oh, the possibilities for electronics. It makes sense. I mean, the current administration can't even give a speech without them.
;)
Of course, many small rural hospitals or small community hospitals can't pay for either the transition to electronic records or the fine for not transitioning to electronic records. So they're pretty much screwed, I guess.
Not to mention the fact that people's personal information is at stake. First of all, hackers, et cetera can steal their Social Security numbers. Second of all, I'm sure that if the government wanted a peek at your personal information, all conveniently digitalized, they could get it. Conspiracy theory? Maybe. Maybe not.
I bet that soon, everything that used to have to be on paper will be digitalized. Take the Constitution, for example. All you'd have to do to change it would be to open a Word document and edit it.
And Obama could easily make a fake birth certificate if it was electronic. Just type out the words, "I was born," and make everyone else make the switch to digital birth certificate. No one would be the wiser!
How about all money has to be electronic, too? The government would be able to get their hands on it a lot more easily if it was electronic, because they could just take it right out of your bank account. No more tax forms, the government just takes the money and you don't have to worry about a thing.
Oh, the possibilities for electronics. It makes sense. I mean, the current administration can't even give a speech without them.
;)
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Does America Have A PROBLEM With Islam? 0_0
Bobby Gosh asks in in a Time magazine article: Does America have a problem with Islam?
Does Islam have a problem with America?
This is like the liberals who ask, "[Why] do the terrorists hate us?"
Yes. The terrorists do hate us, as evidenced by the fact that they take sick pleasure in blowing us to pieces and knocking down our skyscrapers.
Why do they hate us, you ask?
Well, it's partly (though not completely) because of their religion. Don't try to tell me it's not, because first of all, liberals act like they have no IDEA why the terrorists hate us, but they seem to know with ABSOLUTE certainty that it is NOT because of their religion. "Islam is a religion of peace," they claim, and therefore it is completely illogical that Islam is a reason for terrorism.
Islam is a root of terrorism. Why else would they shout, "For Allah!" as they murder thousands of innocent Americans? Why are almost all terrorists Muslims? It's not a coincidence.
The other reason the terrorists hate us is because we are America. We do not approve of stoning adulterers or restricting women's rights. We especially do not approve of bombing anyone we don't like for no good reason.
We are freedom-loving, capitalist, creative, innovative, successful patriots. Liberals, please, don't take offense. I didn't mean you.
And finally, terrorists don't like us because they're psychotic maniacs.
But back to the matter at hand: America's "Islamohpobia." This is the worst fake disease/deficiency ever invented. Even worse than ADHD, ADD, and ODD. This goes beyond making parents who can't discipline their children feel GOOD.
This makes people who can't love America (liberals [and] terrorists) feel RIGHT. It's much worse.
I ask again: Does America have a... a PROBLEM with Islam? Yes and no. America doesn't hate the MAJORITY of Muslims, those who claim they don't practice the extreme interpretations. But we do hate those who, you know... hide a bomb in their pants as a Christmas present, fly planes into buildings, go on shooting sprees, and in general wreak havoc, destruction, death, and mayhem wherever they go, all in the name of Allah.
Yes. I think we have a problem with those people.
I feel bad for average, everyday, non-psycho Muslims. But if they want to live in America, they have to understand that we need to do everything we can to keep it safe, and all the terrorist attacks for many years have been committed by Muslims. If they really are patriotic, as they claim they are... they should have no problem with keeping their country safe.
But really. What kind of questions are we asking? What we really need to know is, does Islam have a problem with America?
Because if it doesn't somebody's got a heck of a lot of explaining to do.
Does Islam have a problem with America?
This is like the liberals who ask, "[Why] do the terrorists hate us?"
Yes. The terrorists do hate us, as evidenced by the fact that they take sick pleasure in blowing us to pieces and knocking down our skyscrapers.
Why do they hate us, you ask?
Well, it's partly (though not completely) because of their religion. Don't try to tell me it's not, because first of all, liberals act like they have no IDEA why the terrorists hate us, but they seem to know with ABSOLUTE certainty that it is NOT because of their religion. "Islam is a religion of peace," they claim, and therefore it is completely illogical that Islam is a reason for terrorism.
Islam is a root of terrorism. Why else would they shout, "For Allah!" as they murder thousands of innocent Americans? Why are almost all terrorists Muslims? It's not a coincidence.
The other reason the terrorists hate us is because we are America. We do not approve of stoning adulterers or restricting women's rights. We especially do not approve of bombing anyone we don't like for no good reason.
We are freedom-loving, capitalist, creative, innovative, successful patriots. Liberals, please, don't take offense. I didn't mean you.
And finally, terrorists don't like us because they're psychotic maniacs.
But back to the matter at hand: America's "Islamohpobia." This is the worst fake disease/deficiency ever invented. Even worse than ADHD, ADD, and ODD. This goes beyond making parents who can't discipline their children feel GOOD.
This makes people who can't love America (liberals [and] terrorists) feel RIGHT. It's much worse.
I ask again: Does America have a... a PROBLEM with Islam? Yes and no. America doesn't hate the MAJORITY of Muslims, those who claim they don't practice the extreme interpretations. But we do hate those who, you know... hide a bomb in their pants as a Christmas present, fly planes into buildings, go on shooting sprees, and in general wreak havoc, destruction, death, and mayhem wherever they go, all in the name of Allah.
Yes. I think we have a problem with those people.
I feel bad for average, everyday, non-psycho Muslims. But if they want to live in America, they have to understand that we need to do everything we can to keep it safe, and all the terrorist attacks for many years have been committed by Muslims. If they really are patriotic, as they claim they are... they should have no problem with keeping their country safe.
But really. What kind of questions are we asking? What we really need to know is, does Islam have a problem with America?
Because if it doesn't somebody's got a heck of a lot of explaining to do.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)